🔆 Beacon

← Search all trials on Beacon

Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women

Recruiting now NCT04124120

Run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · for 18 and older · Women

What this study is about

The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG). The specific aims of ROMA:Women are: Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time. Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups. Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated. Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG. Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.

Who can join (things the study team will check)

✅ You may be able to join if…

🚫 You may not be able to join if…

Where this trial is running

+ 134 more sites.

Who to contact

Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD · 212.746.1812 · mfg9004@med.cornell.edu

It's completely normal to call and ask questions before deciding anything. Mention the study ID: NCT04124120.

Open the interactive checklist for this trial →

Verify everything on the official ClinicalTrials.gov record. Page updated July 2026.

Beacon is an information tool, not medical advice. Whether a trial is right for you is a decision for you, your doctor, and the study team. Trial details come from the official registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and may change — always confirm with the study team. Beacon collects no data about you: this page has no cookies, no accounts, and no tracking.